Jesus Christ AND Ayn Rand?

The media is abuzz about a “schism” in the Republican Party, a “crisis of values” among Conservatives. But, the media – and unfortunately those responding to it – are all too superficial to see that this is more than a political schism; much more. The political aspect is just a faint echo – a tremor, which serves as a precursor to the massive coming earthquake. It is not a political crisis, but a philosophical one. It is not a crisis of conflicting opinions among groups. It is a crisis of conflicting worldviews within individuals. It is a crisis in the deepest part of one’s soul; a crisis of cognitive dissonance run rampant in the minds of men, a war between ideals – and the opposing ideals are not what the headlines would lead you to believe:

Take a Stand Against Rand” says Christian author, Marvin Olasky in World Magazine.

Ayn Rand or Jesus Christ? Conservatives can’t have it both ways” says Mike Lux of the Huffington Post.

You Can’t Reconcile Ayn Rand and Jesus” says CNN Contributor and Professor of Religion at Boston University, Stephan Plethero  in a USA Today Forum.

Christians Must Choose: Ayn Rand or Jesus” reads a headline for the American Values Network.

There is a choice to be made, but it isn’t between Jesus Christ and Ayn Rand. It’s between reason and irrationality; between reality and fantasy; between the objective and the subjective; between truth and fairytales. And it is a choice that primarily needs to be made by Christians.

The political and religious commentators above are quick to blindly pit Christianity against the philosophy of Ayn Rand and then proceed to wholly denounce one in favor of the other as if the two are some random opposing sports teams behind which the masses are to gather according their personal and subjective preferences. They drop, or entirely ignore, the context and the nature of what is being discussed. These are not sports teams – they are worldviews; ideas about reality. And the context is not a popularity contest – it is reality. We are in reality and we are speaking of different views of that reality. Any given aspect of a view of reality will either be accurate or not: true or false. And this, the accuracy of a worldview (or aspects of it) is what matters in the context of reality.

The question to be asked first is not: Are the worldviews of Christianity and Objectivism (Ayn Rand’s philosophy) compatible? Rather it is: What is true? Or, more specific to the context of this discussion: Is there any truth in Christianity or in Objectivism? And here is where the Christian must make the crucial choice mentioned above: will he be an advocate of reason, rationality, and objective truth by objectively assessing the truthfulness of his conceptions of Christianity (and willingly rejecting that which is found to be untrue), or will he be an advocate of irrationality, fantasy, and subjective fairytales by insisting that Christianity is true without any objective reason for believing so – that it’s true merely because he wants it to be.

This – devotion to truth, regardless of the implications – is the foundational and indispensible first step that any man who wishes to be worthy of the title of “Man” must take. Apart from this first step, every thought and crafty sentence, every argument and concept of “proof”, every illusion of truth in one’s head is just that: an illusion – a fleeting and floating cloud of subjective, emotionally charged nothingness. And, therefore, apart from this step, every critique of other worldviews and every bit of “intellectual” commentary is massively pointless and absurd – akin to a child babbling about his dreams to a board of directors in a business meeting. Such is the majority of content of the articles above.

However, once one has taken that first step and decided to live for and love the truth no matter where it may lead, then – and only then – is he fit (assuming he is armed with a proper epistemology) to evaluate the truthfulness, not only of various conceptions of Christianity, but of all ideas, period. Then, he is fit to discover all of the truth – no matter where it came from and no matter where it leads. Then, he will be capable of rising above the stupid and trite ‘sports game’ demonstrated in the above articles and throughout the media, in order to see what is and is not true in the philosophy of Ayn Rand, and to properly integrate it with all other truth which he has discovered, particularly truth about Christianity. Then, rather than emulate the intellectual cowardice of the Seminary professor who told  Dr. John Piper that “[Ayn Rand’s writing] is incredibly dangerous”, he will be able to emulate Paul’s description of an intellectual hero – a  ‘spiritual man who appraises all things’ (1 Cor 2:15) because he will have an objective standard against which to appraise all things. Then, he will be equipped to say with Paul “we destroy speculations and every lofty opinion raised against the knowledge of God, and we take every thought captive to obey Christ “(2 Cor. 10:5) because he will no longer be running from speculations and lofty opinions or retreating to his own personal fantasy-land which he calls “truth”.

This is what is desperately needed on the part of Christians today (and on the part of every man in general). This is not the only step which needs to be taken, but it is the first. This is what I have done, and am eager to continually do. And this first step – together with the path to which it leads – is why I can very comfortably and confidently say that I love Jesus Christ and I love Ayn Rand – and, I love myself. This is the foundational reason that, in spite of massively popular contrary opinions, I can very seriously – and with full conviction – call myself: a Christian egoist.

Related Articles

The “Christian” Fairytale

God: The Immovable Mover


7 thoughts on “Jesus Christ AND Ayn Rand?

  1. The writings of Ayn Rand are incredibly dangerous. So are the teachings of Jesus Christ. Anything that tells men to act on their own behalf is terrifyingly risky. The adversary would have us not question things. in so doing, we are less of a threat to the devil. It is when we step forward, understand the reality of a situation in its full physical, psychological, metaphsyical and spiritual context that we become the fiercest warriors in the fight to reclaim the soul of man for God.

    Ayn Rand was an atheist. I believe that this is a fact of the past. Given the caliber of her mind, I firmly believe that once she returned to the other side of the veil, she quickly integrated the new information with which she was presented, and adjusted her evaluation of reality. I’m glad to see someone else integrating the truths found in the philosophy she put forward with the truth revealed in Christ. I look forward to reading more.

  2. I have to admit that I enjoyed this piece a great deal.. I think it is teetering on brilliant. It won’t persuade the committed objectivist to embrace a God.. None the less it is a courageous body of work.. I may have had you all wrong lolol

  3. Michael, I appreciate the compliment. I’m sure we could have some great conversations at some point. Please feel free to message me through the ‘Message’ option on the facebook page and I will give you my personal email address if you’d like.

  4. I greatly appreciate your article. It echoes much of my thinking as well. I have many friends on both sides of this issue who don’t/won’t understand the similarities of concepts and objectives of both Christ and Rand. If Christians (That’s Christianity not some mainline or fringe interpretation of it.) would get past her avowed Atheism (and vice versa for the other side) and actually read her books (and the Bible) study her philosophy and Christ’s, there is actually more in common than not. It’s a Venn diagram where there is much overlap and only some disagreement. The same could be said when comparing various Christian sects who probably are MORE in disagreement..

    • Thank you Richard. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and sharing that helpful link.

      However, I am going further than simply pointing out similarities (like on a Venn Diagram). I am arguing that there are foundational aspects of Objectivism which are actually foundational to Christianity — and vice versa. Or, to put it another way:

      Ayn Rand discovered a lot of true things about God’s reality which Christians have either forgotten or ignored. Christians need to be corrected on many issues by Ayn Rand, and they both need to be corrected by more accurate thinking in general.

      In other words, I am primarily after what is TRUE — regardless of where it came from (and Christians and Objectivists should be too).

      • I completely agree with what you say and that was my point. The foundations of Christianity and Christ’s teaching are not in conflict with the Objectivist Philosophy. Unfortunately many folks on both sides of this issue choose to “cherry pick” and “sound bite” and involve personalities deliberately looking for conflict. This only weakens there argument and unfortunately occurs in all areas of life. Within Christianity we fight over nuances rather than seeking common ground, Same with Christians vs. Jews vs. Muslims et-al. This seeking common ground, foundational truth can be done without compromising principals.

  5. “Unfortunately many folks on both sides of this issue choose to “cherry pick” and “sound bite””

    I have studied Objectionism and read most of her works. This quite seems to me to encapsulate her view of Jesus:

    “There is a great, basic contradiction in the teachings of Jesus. Jesus was one of the first great teachers to proclaim the basic principle of individualism — the inviolate sanctity of man’s soul, and the salvation of one’s soul as one’s first concern and highest goal; this means — one’s ego and the integrity of one’s ego. But when it came to the next question, a code of ethics to observe for the salvation of one’s soul — (this means: what must one do in actual practice in order to save one’s soul?) — Jesus (or perhaps His interpreters) gave men a code of altruism, that is, a code which told them that in order to save one’s soul, one must love or help or live for others. This means, the subordination of one’s soul (or ego) to the wishes, desires or needs of others, which means the subordination of one’s soul to the souls of others.

    This is a contradiction that cannot be resolved. This is why men have never succeeded in applying Christianity in practice, while they have preached it in theory for two thousand years. The reason of their failure was not men’s natural depravity or hypocrisy, which is the superficial (and vicious) explanation usually given. The reason is that a contradiction cannot be made to work. That is why the history of Christianity has been a continuous civil war — both literally (between sects and nations), and spiritually (within each man’s soul).”

    Have you ever run across any quote of Ayn’s that disagreed with this, Christian Egoist?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s